Robert Rainer MD

Thoughts Are Reality



Posted: Saturday, July 09, 2011

by Robert Rainer MD
http://robertrainermd.com

Utilizing Albert Einstein's infamous equation

E=MC2

I have generated Rainer's Time Longevity Equation by substituting the C coefficient (the speed of light) with its equivalent velocity variables D/T (Distance/ Time)

The Rainer's Time Longevity Equation is:

T=√D2x M x 1/E

Time equals the square root of Distance squared multiplied by Matter then multiplied by the inverse of Energy.

If we use Rainer's Time Longevity Equation and solve for M (Matter) we have the following:

M= E x T2x 1/D2

If we analyze the above equation in detail, it reveals that Matter equals Energy multiplied by Time squared then multiplied by the inverse of Distance squared. In effect, the creation of matter depends on energy applied for a given amount of time with continuous focus. Even man's earliest invention, fire, followed this immutable law -- actively rubbing two sticks together (E), for a prolonged period (T), at one localized spot or focus (1/D2).  Similarly, subsequent inventions such as the light bulb, radio, airplane, and the internet would also follow suit.

Is thought not energy?  Thought is the energy source that allows man to create his world.  Naturally, with thought (E), persistence (T) and focus (1/D2; minimizing D which equates to not deviating from the point of interest), man has created anything that his mind has been able to conceive.  Thought, persistence, and focus are the basis for all creation.  Whatever exists in the physical world, once danced in the mind of its creator.  Hence, the warehouse of man's creative capacity are his dreams.

Our great nation exemplifies Samuel Adam's vision of America as a land of the free.  His thought energy was magnified by his fear of being tried for treason by the King of England.  Thus, his desperation allowed the hasty formation of the Continental Congress with The Declaration of Independence written and signed shortly afterwards.  His intense thought energy culminated in the formation of  a document and ultimately a nation of unprecedented freedom.  The Continental Congress was essentially a 'Master Mind' group of fifty six men resonating the identical 'thought energy' of freedom driven by the fear of hanging if their effort was unsuccessful.

It is not coincidental that many of man's greatest inventions occur during wartime.  The duress and fear of war maximizes thought energy.  Likewise, faith allows thought energy to amplify in strength.  A thought imagined with enough intensity for a prolonged period of time without wavering will ultimately come to fruition.  Is this not the premise of prayer?  Science is baffled by the post-operative patient that heals more rapidly receiving anonymous prayer as opposed to the control patient who does not.  Additionally, the cancer patient that maintains hope is far more likely to survive compared to the one who has given in to the gravity of his disease.  The placebo effect is merely thought energy at work. Thought energy is a creative force that will materialize a physical equivalent if it is of sufficient intensity.

In 1920, the author Napoleon Hill coined a term 'autosuggestion.' He describes the technique as a means to obtain financial wealth by incessantly programming the subconscious mind to seek financial gain.  By repeatedly expressing the desire to obtain wealth, first verbally and then by documenting a plan of action, the subconscious mind will respond by carrying out the programmed instructions that it is continuously fed. The person's daily or conscious actions merely reflect the dictated instructions given to the subconscious mind.  Napoleon Hill, in effect, merely describes maximizing the potential of thought energy to create one's desires as long one remains persistent and focused.

Churches not only have enormous influence but they likewise have enormous power.  Could a global synchronized thought energy or prayer by all church members in unison bring an end to war and poverty?  I firmly believe that an effort should be made to this effect.  Jesus, the son of God, could not have stated it any simpler, ' ...if we have faith the size of a mustard seed, we may move mountains...'

One day man will be able to electronically digitalize thought and amplify it to exponential levels.  By doing so, he will be able to decrease the impact of the time and distance variables to negligible values in an effort to create matter.  Secondly, as a result, whatever man imagines he will be able to create.  Imagine a dinosaur, and thus, it appears.  Imagine earth as heaven and it will be so.  Just as God uses sun (energy) shining at length (time) on one spot (focus equals 1/d2) to create a tree, man has the capacity to create this world as he sees it.  Hence, the question remains, will man see the world as heaven or hell. Thus, the power of man's imagination invariably dictates our destiny.
Robert E. Rainer, MD, is a graduate of the University of Maryland School of Medicine. He completed his residency training in obstetrics and gynecology in 1995 and shortly afterward established his medical practice (see: www.brooklyngynplace.com ). Dr. Rainer's practice flourished and is now a leading OB/GYN practice in New York City. Get his book: www.doctorsguidetowealth.com/index.htm
This Article has been viewed 1,054 times. (Not updated in real-time.)
Top-level comments on this article: (2 total)
» left by Chiradeep
320 days 4 hours ago.
86 fans. Follow Chiradeep on twitter!
Interesting article...Sir...
» left by Connor Davidson
319 days 21 hours ago.
95 fans. Follow Connor Davidson on twitter!
I'm going to be very blunt and honest.

Bull$%&*@$%&.

I looked at your maths for the first part. Your rearrangement is correct based on an incorrect substitution. You cannot substitute D/T in for C. That is simply wrong in terms of both physics and mathematics.

Let me explain the speed of light is a (physical) constant not a variable. For example 5 is a constant. It is true that you can call 5 a/b but only if a/b equals 5 (e.g. when a=10 and b=2). In your case c does equal D/T but only when your distance is say 600,000 Km in a time of 2 seconds.

Your equation breaks the laws of physics by saying that the speed of light can be whatever you like. You do know that if your equations are correct we can travel faster than the speed of light? Since when D= 1m and T= 10 seconds we can out walk light.

There is no point going into thought energy as that's just made up. How this links to prayer I will never understand.

In order to discover new equations a high school level of physics knowledge is advisable.

» left by john from houston 319 days 1 hour ago.
Throw an apple at a barn door... When the apple strikes the barn door, is not energy released? Is the apple traveling at the speed of light? hence, e=mv2 (v is velocity)
» left by john from houston 319 days 1 hour ago.
velocity equals distance/time...... that said, i tend to agree with Dr. Rainer
» left by Connor Davidson 319 days ago.
95 fans. Follow Connor Davidson on twitter!
When you say "released" I think (and hope) you mean converted. That's called conservation of energy - no energy is created.

Velocity equals distance/time should have nothing to do with his equations. He is not deriving from a formula containing any of those variables. But these variables mysteriously appear.

I don't understand how this proves anything.

» left by john from houston 318 days 23 hours ago.
e=md2/t2 is his premise
» left by Connor Davidson 318 days 22 hours ago.
95 fans. Follow Connor Davidson on twitter!
My point is that his premise is wrong.
» left by john from houston 318 days 20 hours ago.
Couldn't disagree more.... e=mv2 holds its weight. Throw a bullet (m=2g) at a stuffed animal and it fails to pierce the fabric (v=50miles/hr); Shoot a bullet from a gun and it shatters the fabric to shreds (v=768miles/hr)... You and I agree to disagree.
» left by john from houston 318 days 20 hours ago.
Sadly Connor....many others disagree with you as well. Read the paper by Ezzat Bakhoum published in 2005 ,"E=MC2 Or Is It?" Don't be so quick to judge young man....
» left by john from houston 318 days 20 hours ago.
... the paper and many others support e=mv2
» left by Connor Davidson 318 days 18 hours ago.
95 fans. Follow Connor Davidson on twitter!
Firstly in your bullet example e=mv2 would give you the wrong energy - in fact double. The formula for kinetic energy is 1/2 mv2 (as an approximation for non-relativistic speeds).

Furthermore Bakhoum (with his 9 references 7 of which are to his own works) does not offer anything proving e=mv2 or disproving e=mc2. He is just saying that e=mc2 has not been experimentally proved but requires electromagnetism for its proof.
» left by john from houston 318 days 15 hours ago.
google e=mv2 and argue with the legions of people who support it.... have a good day
» left by PETER from LONDON 316 days 21 hours ago.
E=MV2 IS NEWTON'S 3RD LAW!!! BY NO MEANS IS IT A STRETCH TO DERIVE E=MD2/T2 SUPPORTING RAINER'S TIME LONGEVITY EQUATION.
» left by Julie from Atlanta 316 days 21 hours ago.
Leave it to an englishman to support Newton
» left by Ezzat G. Bakhoum, Ph.D. from Florida 316 days 20 hours ago.
Dear Dr. Rainer,

Thank you very much for your email. Your website and your articles are very interesting. I’m glad that there are other researchers who think like me.

Best wishes to you,

Ezzat


Ezzat G. Bakhoum, Ph.D.

University of West Florida

We want your comments! If you can read this, you don't have javascript enabled, so you can't use this comment system. Please enable javascript.